Because alot of people did not like cataclysm. If blizzard wants that same thing to happen again like in 2010, I guess that is up to them. Like I want permanent classic wrath servers so badly it isn’t even funny. Those players will be gone when cata classic deletes everything. And I feel like there are also alot of folks still here, who absolutely love wrath. I can guarantee you that if they deny folks the right to choose classic wrath, alot of folks will just completely shut off wow for good.Įven now as we speak, people are quitting over tokens being brought over. If I were the developer instead of a regularly ignored/censored user, this is the cataclysm you could have had back then, or hosted now. They needed to pick a side and stick with it. The main fault of cataclysm is trying to be a new game AND expansion at same time. Blizzard even admitted that putting in flying was one of their biggest mistakes but cataclysm was a missed golden opportunity to take them back out. This means there’s no need fly flying anymore other than a few things after 60 which could be edited for ground access. The game would take place entirely on Earth with no outland/northrend. 41p could have been ok with 60-65 levels. This would also make the talent page reductions less stupid. It should not try to be an expansion as well. Put the new content at 60, with the new cap being 65. This is unnecessary for a whole new world full of players. Cataclysm made everything a complete joke until you get to heroics. Unnerf the difficulty of questing and dungeons.Heirlooms could be left in but no one would have any at launch. New realms only, no clones or transfers, must go through the new world.This is a lost cause, but I will offer some ways cataclysm could be done to “not” make it a complete trainwreck.
0 kommentar(er)
